1st Quarter 2004: Global
markets 1st quarter 2004 - the weak
US dollar
Is it really America’s
problem at the moment? Well, if
you think about it carefully –
not really. But let’s first
look at what caused the US Dollar
to weaken. Over the past number
of years, as growth in the USA has
often exceeded the average growth
achieved in many other countries,
American consumers have relied more
heavily on imports. As a result,
America needs to borrow more in
order to finance the trade account
deficit that has come about as a
result of these increased imports.
American exports grew by 4.6% in
2003, while imports grew by some
8.3%. So pressure has been put on
the US Dollar because cash flowed
out of the country to pay for imports,
while goods and services kept flowing
in – the result; a weaker
currency. For example, in December
the overall deficit with China increased
to $124 billion. In addition, remember
that interest rates in the USA are
at levels well below many of its
trading partners (except, of course,
Japan) making it an unattractive
destination for foreign investment
cash flows – another factor
that keeps the US Dollar under pressure.
How does a weak US
Dollar impact on American corporates?
A weak US Dollar is good news for
American manufacturers in that it
promotes US exports because they
become cheaper to countries that
import American goods. Stronger
exports from the USA (because American
companies become more competitive
with a weaker US Dollar) improve
domestic growth in America and stimulate
job creation. The more America exports,
the more cash flow that flows in
to offset against the current account
deficit. All this, of course, is
especially good news in an election
year, with domestic growth and job
creation being two strategic issues
for the Bush administration.
So, we’ve established
that currently a weak US Dollar
is by and large favourable for corporate
and manufacturing America, but what
about the impact on American citizens
themselves? The US dollar has recently
touched 3 year lows against the
Japanese Yen, 11 year lows against
the Pound and all time lows against
the Euro. International tourists
to the United States are finding
it much cheaper on their pockets
- American tourists are finding
it a lot more expensive. Take the
following example – where
it would have cost an American tourist
some $1 500 to spend a weekend
at an upmarket hotel in London just
one year ago, this same weekend
will now cost an additional $175.
On the other hand, as a result of
a combination of a weak US Dollar
and the fear of flying that exists
amongst many since the events of
911, the price of accommodation
in New York has reduced by more
than a third – good news for
incoming tourists? Of course it
is – and it is also good news
for the USA in that an increasing
number of tourists boost job creation.
So, where is the major
impact of the weak US Dollar being
felt the most? Take Europe, as an
example – a company like Volkswagen
that exports over 250 thousand vehicles
a year to the United States will
now find it more cost effective
at current exchange rates, to manufacture
these vehicles in Mexico, rather
than back at home in Germany. Japan,
for instance, has spent over $187
billion participating in the foreign
exchange markets in an attempt to
stem the effects of a weak US Dollar.
Why would Japan do this –
again, they are an export driven
economy and consequently cannot
afford to be priced out of the market.
Regions like Asia, too, are finding
it difficult to have their exports
to the USA remain competitive.
In summary, the benefits
for America brought about currently
by a weak US Dollar, especially
with 2004 being an election year,
make a weak US Dollar an appealing
option. So, is a weak US Dollar
America’s problem right now?
Not really, unfortunately it becomes
the rest of the world’s problem.
The Federal Reserve
kept interest rates on hold at 1%
at their January meeting. A rate
of 1% was last seen in 1962. Subtle
changes, however, were made to the
wording of their statement following
this announcement. They substituted
the wording from previous reports
where they indicated that rates
would be kept on hold for “a
considerable period” with
saying that they could be “patient”
with rates. Following on from this
announcement, Ethan Harris, chief
economist for Lehman Brothers stated:
“they keep fiddling with the
language, and the general tone of
the directive keeps getting a little
less dovish”.
Being “patient”
sounds a little less like they’re
keeping rates on hold than a “considerable
period” – though you’d
need to study a dictionary closely
to figure that out.” Many
investors are of the opinion that
the change to the Federal Reserve’s
language “was a hint that
the central bank was moving closer
to raising rates”. In its
most recent statement “the
Fed painted a mixed picture of the
economy saying output was “expanding
briskly” but that new hiring
was “subdued” and that
inflation was “muted”.”
Despite increasing
evidence that prices are likely
to start rising (due to the declining
value of the dollar, the rise in
gold, oil and other commodity prices)
many economists still believe that
the Federal Reserve are unlikely
to raise short-term rates until
there is clear evidence of consistent
job growth and an indication that
inflation is rising. According to
recent figures released by the Commerce
Department, the US economy grew
by 3.1% in 2003, which is the best
growth level since 2000.
No changes were made
to interest rates during the quarter
under review. This is the eighth
consecutive month where rates have
remained unchanged. At the moment
interest rates in the Eurozone are
at half the levels of those in the
United Kingdom (2% versus 4%). While
economists expected no change over
the quarter, some still believe
that a cut in rates is likely to
curb the rise of the Euro. The ECB
is widely known for its conservatism,
and this has been questioned more
closely in recent weeks, with the
Euro reaching levels unprecedented
since its launch some five years
ago.
Recent economic data
in the region has improved, however
the pace has been weak The most
recent 2004 growth forecasts by
the European Central Bank are between
1.1% and 2.1%. According to Germany’s
Economics Minister, Wolfgang Clement,
“the Euro’s strength
and the Dollar’s weakness
are the biggest risk to growth at
the moment.”
The Bank of England
increased interest rates to 4% at
their February meeting, after announcing
a 0.25% increase. The increase was
widely expected in light of recent
economic data that had pointed to
the fact that the UK economy has
been growing at a good pace. Despite
expectations that the November rate
increase would put a dampener on
ever-increasing house prices, few
signs of this have been evident.
Reacting to the news of the most
recent rate increase, David Frost,
director general of the British
Chamber of Commerce, expressed his
disappointment saying “This
rise is premature and is likely
to hit recovery over the head before
it gains momentum.”
He also stated that it is difficult
to justify the increase in rates
when the inflation rate is currently
below the target level. You will
recall from our last report that
the primary reason given for the
November rate hike was that inflation
had moved slightly above the target
level. The Treasury appear to support
the stance of pre-emptive rate increases
that are aimed at curbing the economy
from “overheating”.
In essence, the view is that the
Bank of England, “while not
looking to shackle growth, want
it to proceed at a more sustainable
pace.” The latest figures
released by the Office for National
Statistics indicate that the UK
economy grew by 2.1% in 2003. It
is interesting to note that in January
the jobless rate declined to 2.9%
- a 30 year low.
Japan has been one
of the major beneficiaries of increased
investor confidence over the past
year. With Japan largely being an
export driven economy, the region
has continued to benefit from ongoing
demand from Asia, the United States
and China. As a result, in the last
quarter of 2003 the Japanese economy
grew at its fastest pace in 13 years.
The increased demand for Japanese
exports has impacted positively
on employment in the region, which
in turn bodes well for increased
consumer spending. Kazumasa Iwata,
the deputy governor of the Bank
of Japan, said at a recent conference
in Kobe that the GDP numbers may
suggest that the economy is reaching
a “turning point”.
The authorities, being
very aware of the risk posed by
an appreciating Yen, have intervened
on a number of occasions to curb
this trend (the Yen rose by 10%
against the US Dollar last year).
With the Japanese financial year-end
only a number of weeks away a strengthening
Yen would not be good news for corporate
profits. The Bank of Japan have
made it clear that it will not make
the same mistakes as it has in the
past i.e. by smothering a economic
recovery due to tightening policy
too early.
Prime Minister Koizumi
continues to focus at lot of attention
on solving the problems of the banking
sector.
The Monetary Policy
Committee reduced interest rates
by 0.50% at their December 2003
meeting, bringing the total interest
rate reductions during 2003 to 5.50%.
No changes were made to interest
rates at the February 26th and 27th
meeting, so the Repo Rate and Prime
remain at 8% and 11.5%, respectively.
The general view is that we are
at the end of this declining interest
rate cycle and there is even speculation
that we could be in for interest
rate increases during the last quarter
of this year and on into 2005. This
is supported by the opinion that
CPIX inflation is likely to have
bottomed and is expected to rise
over the next two years. However,
if CPIX inflation declines further
(with possible underpinning from
the Rand), this would be supportive
of further interest rate cuts. Other
factors, such as the stability of
the oil price, food prices (consider
the drought currently being experienced
in the northern regions of South
Africa) and the level of international
interest rates are likely to play
a part in this decision. According
to a recent Reuters Econometer Survey,
economists have revised their 2004
CPIX inflation average to 4.84%
from a previous view of 4.72%. They
expect CPIX inflation to average
5.6% for 2005.
The Rand, which remained
volatile over the quarter, depreciated
against the US Dollar, Pound and
Euro by 3.42%, 12.29% and 7.78%
respectively.
Domestic growth for
2003 came in at a disappointing
1.9%. This is well below 2002 (3.6%)
and 2001 (2.7%) growth levels. The
National Treasury forecast 2004
growth at 2.9%. The impact of a
firmer Rand on exports is clearly
evidenced by this number.
2004/5 BUDGET
The Budget Speech
delivered in Cape Town on the 18th
February held few surprises. Personal
income taxes were reduced by some
R4 billion, with the largest benefit
(49%) going to taxpayers who earn
between R60 000 and R150 000.
The interest exemption for under
65’s was raised from R10 000
to R11 000, while for taxpayers
over the age of 65 the exemption
was increased from R15 000
to R16 000. In addition the
tax brackets were adjusted, with
the top threshold increasing from
R255 000 to R270 000.
The Primary Rebate was increased
to R5 800 from R5 400.
No changes were made
to Exchange Controls applicable
to individuals – it was mentioned
that some 14 000 amnesty applications
had already been processed.
The price of Brent
crude oil increased during the quarter
to end the period at $33.24 per
barrel, from $30.39 per barrel at
the end of the previous quarter.
OPEC, in a surprise move, announced
at its February 10th meeting that
it would cut production by 4% (1
million barrels per day). The main
reason given for this move was that
OPEC anticipates a “seasonal
downturn in demand”. However,
there is another possible interpretation
of their latest move. OPEC, more
specifically over recent months,
but in fact over the past few years,
have been careful not to let the
oil price rise too much so as not
to push the global economy into
a recession. A global recession
would not be good news for OPEC
as, demand for oil would decline,
and consequently so would the price.
However, this stance is likely to
have cost them dearly in terms of
lost revenues. With the global economic
environment having improved in recent
months, the Federal Reserve likely
to keep rates low for the foreseeable
future and a commodity run that
has been underway for the past several
months, could it simply be a case
of OPEC wanting to participate in
this upturn in the commodity cycle?
The gold price increased
sharply over the quarter –
ending the quarter at $398.90 an
ounce, compared to $376.50 an ounce
at the end of November 2003. As
highlighted previously, the current
upward trend in the gold price began
in early 2001 after the Federal
Reserve began its series of interest
rates cuts. The gold price has continued
to climb as USA short-term interest
rates have remained low –
low interest rates make the opportunity
cost of holding gold low. A weak
US Dollar, together with low short-term
interest rates, have provided support
for the gold price at these higher
levels.
Equities surprised
on the upside in 2003 (from early
March), with the various indices
posting the following base currency
returns:
| S&P
500 |
Dow
Jones |
Nasdaq |
FTSE
100 |
Nikkei
225 |
MSCI |
JSE
ALSI |
| JSE
ALSI |
28.3% |
50% |
25.5% |
28% |
33.8% |
18.1% |
|
While the base currency
returns posted during 2003 were
encouraging, it is important that
we remind ourselves of the fact
that these returns came off of a
very low base, and accordingly,
we need to modify our expectations
in respect of returns in 2004 and
not base them on the performances
exhibited in 2003.
We encourage you to
visit our website www.finlaw.co.za
where you will find a range of interesting
articles updated daily. In addition
you will be able to access our quarterly
economic reports.
QUARTERLY QUOTE
"For myself I am an optimist
– it does not seem to be much
use being anything else."
Sir Winston Churchill
his report is based
on information sourced from various
institutions, both local and international.
The report reflects a variety of
views and is not intended to convey
investment advice. Please consult
us to obtain specific advice relevant
to your investment portfolio.