1st Quarter 2005: Global
Markets 1st quarter 2005 - Will
the stampede of the South African
equity bulls continue in 2005
Having recently visited
several fund management houses in
Cape Town it was interesting to
note the views expressed regarding
the outlook for domestic equities
this year. We all know that most
domestic equity unit trust funds
delivered exceptional performances
during the second half of last year,
but of course, the important question
now is whether or not these performances
are likely to continue in 2005?
Although the consensus view is that
they should, there are varied opinions
as to how much "steam" is left in
the current equity bull run.
An interesting view
was put forward by one of the larger
investment houses. They highlighted
three possible scenarios for 2005,
but the one which they currently
believe is the most likely, is that
it appears as if the domestic economy
may be back in a "60's" type environment.
Typically inflation is benign, interest
rates are low, GDP growth is respectable
and domestic demand is resilient.
Included in this set of variables
is a stable Rand. In addition, commodity
prices should remain fairly stable
and global growth is likely to be
sustainable. Of course, this type
of environment would be favorable
for domestic equities.
While the other houses
visited didn't necessarily disagree
with this scenario, the much talked
about negative issues of three years
ago - the impact of aids on the
economy and more particularly on
the labour market, the expensive
domestic labour market and the likes
of Zimbabwe, etc - were raised.
In fact, some argued that instead
of improving, these factors had
become progressively worse and therefore
could not be ignored. Other headwinds
raised include the rising domestic
current account deficit and the
possibility that interest rates
in the US could be raised much faster
than expected.
When all was said and done they
did agree that domestic equities,
while no longer cheap in absolute
terms, are expected to deliver good
returns this year. But of course,
this does not mean that they all
agreed on which sector would win
first prize this year. Will it be
financials again or will the industrial
sector exchange second place for
first? Could the Rand surprise on
the downside and bring resources
back into the limelight?
Despite our view that domestic equities
should once again deliver respectable
returns, we believe that the "easy
money" has been made. Accordingly,
it is important to modify performance
expectations from this asset class,
especially in view of the fact that
the market is now coming off a much
higher base.
Because the same asset class cannot
consistently outperform the others,
we believe strongly in the merits
of diversification across asset
classes in accordance with one's
personal risk profile. Finally,
it is at times like these, when
one asset class is clearly outperforming
the rest, that it is never wise
to "tilt" your portfolio in that
direction at the expense of your
personal risk profile.
In line with expectations,
interest rates were increased by
25 basis points at the February
meeting of the Federal Reserve.
The decision to raise
rates by a quarter percent was unanimous
and brings interest rates to 2,50%.
This was the sixth consecutive increase
since last June. Following on from
the announcement, the Federal Reserve
stated that "output appears to be
growing at a moderate pace, despite
the rise in energy prices and labour
market conditions continue to improve
gradually."
According to an economist
from Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein
"they are basically laying the groundwork
for another rate hike in March and
there was no surprise in today's
hike or language."
Rates are expected to end the year
at between 3,50% and 4%, provided
the Federal Reserve observes their
"measured" stance. This should serve
to keep inflation benign, without
limiting economic growth. The risks
of an upturn in inflation have increased
recently as a result of a combination
of a weak US Dollar, low interest
rates and higher commodity and oil
prices. The environment of tax rebates
and low interest rates supported
growth in 2004, which is estimated
at 4,40% for the calendar year.
Alan Greenspan's term as Governor
of the Federal Reserve ends in January
next year after a 14 year term and,
with less than 12 months to go,
there is much speculation about
who will succeed him. Three candidates
who are the most widely talked about
currently are Ben Bernanke, Don
Kohn and current Fed Vice Chairperson,
Roger Ferguson.
Despite market pressure
to cut interest rates, interest
rates remained unchanged at 2% in
the Eurozone. Inflation is still
above the target level of 2% and
there are growing concerns about
the potential impact of a sustained
high oil price on this number going
forward. As stated in our last report,
the European Central Bank still
has concerns about liquidity and
this would imply that the next move
in interest rates is likely to by
up. However these high levels of
liquidity have been around for some
time now, with no changes to interest
rates.
The GDP number for
2004 is expected to be confirmed
at 1,70%. This is fairly pedestrian
when compared to the expected growth
rates from the other economic regions.
Interest rates remained
at 4,75% and have been kept on hold
for the last six months (since August
last year). Rates, which moved up
by 1% during 2004, could still rise
further during 2005.
The primary reason
for this view is that inflation,
although still under the targeted
band of 2%, has risen steadily in
recent months. In December CPI rose
to 1.60% (remaining at this level
in January), which is the highest
rate recorded in six months. Factors
contributing to this increase were
housing, electricity, gas and water
costs, which have risen by some
5,40%.
Deloitte, a City
consultancy, do not agree with this
view. They are forecasting a growth
rate of 2% in 2005, which is well
below the 3% to 3,50% forecast by
Gordon Brown. They believe that
interest rates should end the year
at 4% and decline to 3,50% by the
end of 2006. Substantiating this
view is the slowdown in the housing
market, which they believe could
lead to a rise in unemployment and
a drop in consumer spending.
According to Roger Bootle, Deloitte's
chief economic advisor "whereas
the main driver of the economy in
recent years has been robust household
spending growth, this is likely
to suffer as the housing market
slowdown gathers pace."
The latest mortgage figures released
by the British Bankers Association
indicate that the number of mortgages
approved during December 2004 (40
201) fell by 38% when compared to
December 2003 (64 563). Figures
released from the Bank of England
indicate, however, that new loans
in December increased to 83 000,
representing the first increase
in loans since May. The contradictory
figures released by the British
Bankers Association and the Bank
of England are concerning.
Slower capital spending
in China, together with yen appreciation
and a slowdown in consumer spending
during the second half of 2004,
contributed to a slowdown in exports
over this period. Consequently,
GDP declined by some 0,10% during
the last quarter, pushing the Japanese
economy back into recession (for
the fourth time in 10 years). Typically,
a recession is defined as "two consecutive
quarters of negative growth". According
to Heizo Takenaka, Economic and
Fiscal Policy Minister, "the economy
has some soft patches but if you
look at the bigger picture, it is
in a recovery stage. The economy
must be assessed comprehensively
and we cannot look at GDP alone".
A "soft landing" is
expected in the Chinese economy
in 2005 and this should be good
news for Japanese exports. It is
also anticipated that in 2005 Japan
will see the end of deflation, which
has prevailed for some eight years
in the region. This would be positive
for consumer spending. The positive
impact of cost cutting and restructuring
measures that have been underway
for some time is expected to come
through in corporate profits growth.
While analysts were disappointed
with the most recent figures, they
remain upbeat, explaining that capital
spending is on the increase and
that "Japan's largest companies
had been recording healthy profits".
Driven by strong performance in
the first half of 2004, Japan's
economy grew by 2,6% last year and
is expected to grow by some 2,1%
this year, despite the negative
numbers for the last quarter of
2004. A lot will depend on an improvement
in global economies, combined with
a fall in value of the yen and an
increase in consumer spending. Interest
rates are not expected to change
in 2005.
The Reserve Bank Monetary
Policy Committee (MPC) kept interest
rates on hold at their most recent
meeting in February. This was the
third consecutive meeting that rates
have remained unchanged. Following
on from the announcement, the Governor
said "the MPC will continue to monitor
developments in the economy and
the factors affecting inflation
very closely and will stand ready
to adjust the stance in either direction
if necessary depending on the outlook
for inflation." The following factors
could impact negatively on the inflation
target: "sustained strong growth
in domestic demand, continued increases
in money supply last year, the strong
demand for bank credit, and the
likely impact of external developments."
According to the Governor, "the
commitment by the government to
fiscal prudence and of the public
authorities to low administered
price increases, moderation in the
increases in food prices, and continued
low inflation internationally" are
all factors that are likely to contribute
to the maintenance of low inflation
over the next two years.
South Africa achieved
GDP growth of 3,70% in 2004. CPIX
averaged 4,30% for 2004, which is
well within the target range of
between 3% to 6%. CPIX has remained
within this targeted band for the
last 16 months.
The fundamentals in the domestic
economy are looking favourable for
respectable growth this year. GDP
is expected to rise to 4,3% this
year (from 3,7% in 2004), fuelled
by low interest rates (at 24 year
lows), low inflation and strong
consumer demand. The strong consumer
demand in the last quarter was primarily
for imported goods (which have become
cheaper due to the strong Rand)
as well as the services sector of
the economy, which is largely insulated
from Rand movements. It is no secret,
though, that the strong Rand has
impacted negatively on the manufacturing
sector, which has to operate in
an environment of less profitable
exports and cheaper imports.
The Rand ended the quarter at R5,81,
R7,69 and R11,15 to the US Dollar,
Euro and Sterling, respectively.
The annual budget
speech held few surprises. The primary
focus on spending "remains on uplifting
the poor through strong welfare
spending combined with improving
delivery and infrastructure"
Moderate personal
tax relief was announced, with the
majority of this relief being focussed
on the lower to middle income groups.
The interest exemption for under
65's increases from R11 000 to R15
000, while for taxpayers over the
age of 65 the exemption increases
by R16 000 to R22 000. The foreign
dividend exemption increases to
R2 000. The tax brackets have been
adjusted, with the top threshold
increasing from R270 000 to R300
000. The top marginal tax rate (currently
40%) remains unchanged. The Primary
Rebate increases to R6 300. The
tax threshold for under 65's increases
to R35 000 (an 8,6% increase), while
for over 65's the tax threshold
increases to R60 000 from R50 000
(a 20% increase).
Many were disappointed
that retirement tax is to remain
at 18% and that exchange control
relaxation remains on hold. In a
surprise move, company tax rates
have been reduced to 29% from 30%.
This should improve competitiveness
over the medium to long term. The
threshold for transfer duty increases
from R150 000 to R190 000 effective
1 March.
The oil price edged
higher during the quarter under
review. On 28 February 2005 the
oil price was $50.14 a barrel, compared
to $44.87 at the end of November
2004. At a meeting on 30 January
2005 OPEC agreed to keep output
levels unchanged (currently at 27
million barrels a day). In addition,
it was agreed at the meeting to
abandon the $22 to $28 target price
band set in 2000. According to Yasser
Elguindi of Medley Global Advisors,
"oil prices are high but the US
economy hasn't skipped a beat and
the weaker dollar has insulated
many growing economies from the
shock." Saudi Arabia, on the other
hand, have indicated that they are
planning to increase capacity by
a further 1,5 million barrels per
day within the next 4 years. It
is interesting to note that Chinese
imports of crude oil, which in 2004
played a key role in the rise in
the oil price, decreased by 24%
in January compared to the same
time last year.
The gold price ended the quarter
significantly lower at $435-85 compared
to a close of $453-25 at the end
of November 2004. In a Commodity
View report written in January,
HSBC expect gold to be the only
metal to have a higher average price
in 2005 ($455/oz) than in 2004.
In fact, in the second half of the
year they indicate that it is possible
for the gold price to exceed $500/oz
at times. Improving fundamentals
and the fact that gold is seen to
have the "strongest negative correlation
with the dollar" supports their
view.
On the whole 2004
was a good year for equities both
locally and internationally. The
local FTSE / JSE ALSI returned 20.42%
in Rand terms, while on the international
front, the MSCI World index returned
15.30% in US Dollar terms. The S&P
500 and the FTSE 100 posted returns
of 10,90% and 19,30%, respectively,
in US Dollar terms. Bonds, on the
other hand delivered mixed performance.
World growth is expected to slow
to about 3,1% in 2005 in an environment
where global imbalances are likely
to remain.
In the UK and the
US interest rates appear to be in
an upward trend, while in the Eurozone
and Japan interest rates remain
on hold. Back at home, there is
a strong call for a further cut
in interest rates this year.
Again we stress the importance of
diversification, and, as pointed
out in our lead article, when one
asset class is clearly outperforming
the rest, it is never wise to "tilt"
your portfolio in that direction
at the expense of your personal
risk profile.
QUARTERLY QUOTE
"If all economists were laid end
to end, they would not reach a conclusion"
George Bernard Shaw
This report
is based on information sourced
from various institutions, both
local and international. The report
reflects a variety of views and
is not intended to convey investment
advice. Please consult us to obtain
specific advice relevant to your
investment portfolio.